I love the Inclusive Design Principles and often refer to them in discussions about accessibility. I also like language, so I thought why not translate them into Dutch?
The Inclusive Design Principles are written by the good people of The Paciello Group. They give guidance on how to make your websites and apps work for more people and make user-centered choices. The document urges makers of websites to think about context, consistency, choice and control, and emphasises that our products should add value, offer the same to all users and make primary content and tasks the first thing on a page.
If you would like to read or share them in Dutch, you now can, as Principes voor Inclusive Design is now live.
Comments, likes & shares (19)
Micah Tigley, Paul van Buuren, kabreslow, Adam Silver, Kevin Pennekamp, geertmelotte, Edward Mac Gillavry and Level Level liked this
Large Heydon Collider, Michiel Bijl, Karl Groves , M Burford, Rian Rietveld, Bram Smulders, Kevin Pennekamp and Level Level reposted this
The year is about to end, so it is time for another year in review post! I love reading what others write about their years, hopefully mine is interesting to some people.
Like last year, I’ve divided stuff into highlights and things I learned. To be clear, that doesn’t mean I had a year consisting of 100% highlights and learnings, there is also stuff that went wrong, wasn’t amazing or was personal, I just think they’re for elsewhere (in person over drinks).
Highlights
Projects
In 2018, I spent most of my time in Mozilla’s Open Innovation team, working specifically on the IAM project. For those unfamiliar with it, IAM is short for identity and access management, it is about how people proof who they are and get access to stuff with as little friction as possible. It’s been super exciting to build most of the front-end for a project codenamed “DinoPark”.
In the last quarter, I’ve also spent a day a week working at the City of The Hague, specifically helping with improving accessibility and profesionalising front-end development of their digital services. It’s been great to see improvements shipped both in the application’s code as well as the content management system product.
Other short engagements included:
Volunteering
I did not do a lot of volunteering this year, but I did translate the Inclusive Design Principles into Dutch and worked on improving MDN documentation on accessibility.
Conferences and events
This year, I attended these events:
I spoke multiple times, too:
I did my CSS Layout workshop three more times (for Fronteers and at Front-end United) and ran a new accessible components workshop (for Frozen Rockets).
Organisers, thanks so much for having me. The first time conference speaking was stressful, time-consuming and very scary, but also satisfying. I got great feedback, both praise and things I can improve on (thanks, you know who you are).
I’d love to speak more in 2019, please do get in touch if you want to have me present at your event or give a workshop.
Writing
I published 26 posts on this blog, not including this one. Like I said in last year’s review: I very much recommend writing, it can be helpful in many ways. It is also great to be able to do this on a domain you own, on pages you designed. If anyone needs mentoring around this, get in touch, I would love to help!
Some of the most read posts:
display: contents
implementation in major browswers that undoes accessibility benefits the property could have brought otherwiseReading
It felt a bit weird to have the Goodreads app keep me in check reading-wise, but it did the job. I managed to read more than the goal I set. Some that readers of this blog might find interesting:
For all the ‘big data’ and AI expertise that Amazon, which owns Goodreads, has, the app is still very bad at recommending new books. For me, it doesn’t go beyond what the most generic airport bookshops stock. The real human beings I have befriended there brought much more reading inspiration.
Things I learned
Some random things I learned:
document.activeElement
), but also as a thing in people’s thinking, not necessarily the same way. And then I’m not even talking about indicating focus yet. In my talk in Groningen I spent a number of slides trying to get it crystal clear. I like Laura Carvajals “You wouldn’t steal their cursor” and tried a streetlights metaphor (they are not pretty, but if they’re not there, you can’t see where you’re going at night)What I want to get better at next year:
With that, I wish all readers a fantastic 2019! If anyone has written year in review posts, I’d love to hear about them in the comments/webmentions, and read what you have done.